What agrees and separates grammatically in the remainder of the verbal sentence

Abstract

This study was divided into six topics, but before listing the summary of the six topics, the researcher stopped at defining some terms and the points of reference for each subject, whether to the verb, or to the owner of the position, or to its companion, or to its interpreter, then the topics were listed as follows:
  The first topic stopped at what agreed and differed in the formulas of these wastes in terms of rigidity and derivation, and the types of solid ones and the types of derivatives.
As for the second topic, it dealt with wastes in terms of definition and denial, what comes from them as knowledge, what comes from them as nothing, and what comes from everyone.
The third topic dealt with the images of the arrangement and composition of these wastes in sentences, which is the introduction and delay of what is permissible and what is not permissible, and sometimes what must be presented because of the right of priority.
The fourth topic, which is close to the previous topic in the issue of sentence structure, namely deletion and mention, what is permissible to be omitted and what is not permissible and what should sometimes be omitted for contextual reasons.
The fifth topic, in which the researcher dealt with the diversity of the forms of compositions in virtue and their absence in terms of their coming singular, sentence and semi-sentence.
The sixth topic, in which the points of agreement and divergence of these wastes were studied in the matter of singling out, flexing, and collecting these formulas.