Debt Writing between Obligation and Willingness

Abstract

This research discusses the ruling of debt documentation in Islamic law and whether writing it down is obligatory or recommended. The dispute among scholars is divided into two main opinions: one considers it obligatory, while the other views it as desirable. Each opinion is supported by strong evidence and references. The research concludes by favoring the view that writing debts is recommended but acknowledges the argument for its obligation, especially in contemporary societies where disputes arise due to lack of documentation. The research emphasizes that documenting debts helps protect assets and prevents disputes, ensuring the rights of contracting parties and preventing fraud and betrayal. The study is divided into three main sections: terms related to the research, evidence of the legitimacy of debt documentation, and the ruling on documenting debts. The research concludes by stressing the importance of debt documentation to preserve rights and avoid conflicts, and advocates for using writing as a means to secure rights in transactions.