Going beyond the right to international humanitarian intervention toward the responsibility to protect

Abstract

The total transformations which took place in the post-cold war system. particularly in the type of the international. from dual polar to unipolar. and the transformation in the concepts of human rights and souvereignty. gave rise to rapid re-appearance of human intervention which became widely known as "one person in the international law resorts to political and economic and even military coercion in order to stop physical violations of human rights. particularly the rights which are associated with life and existence and prevention of genocides. This. however. should be based on proper resolutions from the international organization. So there is no possibility for using force to protect the democratic options of peoples in form of democratic intervention. Also. using justifications for protecting international peace and security as a basis for human intervention is in fact indirect and incidental justification.
In addition. human intervention is no more illegal as it was in the past The African Union Organization Charter. for example. legislated human intervention under article (4)/H4)/Y) to transfer the idea of human intervention in 2001 through the International Committee for Intervention and Souvereignty n new comparison under title: (Responsibility of Protection which Guarantees Human Rights) without dispensing with the principle of souvereignty. Responsibility of protection means that the state is at the beginning the responsible for protecting its citizens from natural. human or international catastrophes If they cannot or do not like to prevent these serious violations to human rights the principle of non-intervention gives way for the responsibility of international protection.