Peer-reviewed peers

Peer Review Process at Queen Arwa University Journal

The peer review process is a fundamental aspect of academic publishing at the Queen Arwa University Journal, ensuring the quality and accuracy of published research. We adhere to strict standards to ensure that the review process is fair, objective, and transparent.

1. Objectives of the Review Process

  • Ensuring Scientific Quality: Verify the originality and quality of submitted research.
  • Improving Research: Provide constructive feedback to help authors improve their work.
  • Integrity and Transparency: Maintain the integrity and objectivity of the publication process.

2. Stages of the Review Process

  • A. Initial Submission and Receipt of Manuscript

    • Initial Submission: The editorial team receives manuscripts submitted by authors via the Open Journal Systems (OJS) or email.
    • Preliminary Check: The editorial team reviews the manuscript to ensure it meets the journal's requirements and basic standards such as originality and formatting.

  • B. Selection of Reviewers

    • Reviewer Selection: Expert reviewers are chosen based on their academic knowledge and expertise in the relevant field, regardless of nationality or gender. The journal aims to invite a diverse range of international and local reviewers to join the team of experts and advisors.
    • Double-Blind Review: The identities of authors and reviewers are concealed from each other to ensure an unbiased and objective evaluation.

  • C. Review of the Manuscript

    • Sending the Manuscript: The manuscript is sent to selected reviewers with a request to evaluate it according to specific criteria.
    • Evaluation: Reviewers assess the manuscript based on several criteria, including:
      1. Completeness of scientific elements in the study's introduction. - 20 points
      2. The relevance of the study topic to contemporary scientific interest in the field. - 10 points
      3. Comprehensive and up-to-date literature review. - 10 points
      4. Clarity of research objectives and questions. - 5 points
      5. Appropriateness of the study design to the objectives. - 5 points
      6. Clarity of the study methodology. - 10 points
      7. Language quality. - 20 points
      8. Contribution to knowledge development. - 10 points
      9. Clarity and accuracy in discussing the study's data. - 10 points
      10. Adequacy and appropriateness of result analysis. - 10 points
      11. Conclusions based on the presented results. - 10 points
      12. Novelty and contribution of the research to the field. - 10 points
      13. Accuracy of documentation. - 10 points

  • D. Submission of the Review Report

    • Report Preparation: Reviewers write detailed reports that include their evaluation of the manuscript and provide recommendations regarding acceptance, rejection, or revision.
    • Recommendations: Potential recommendations include:
      • Acceptance as is: If the manuscript meets all quality standards.
      • Acceptance with minor revisions: If the manuscript is generally good but needs minor improvements.
      • Acceptance with major revisions: If the manuscript requires significant changes before acceptance.
      • Rejection: If the manuscript is not suitable for publication in the journal.

  • E. Final Decision

    • Review of Review Reports: The editorial team reviews the reviewers' reports and recommendations.
    • Final Decision: The final decision on the publication of the manuscript is based on the reviewers' evaluations and the editorial team's review.

  • F. Communication with Authors

    • Informing Authors: Authors are notified of the review decision, whether acceptance, rejection, or a request for revisions. Review reports are provided without disclosing the reviewers' names.
    • Request for Revisions: If revisions are requested, authors are given a specified timeframe to make the necessary changes and submit a revised version.

  • G. Final Review and Publication

    • Review of Revised Manuscript: The revised manuscript is reviewed by the editorial team, and it may be sent back to reviewers for confirmation that all comments have been addressed.
    • Final Publication: Upon final approval, the manuscript is prepared for publication and scheduled for inclusion in the upcoming issue of the journal.

3. Article Evaluation Criteria

  • Originality of Research: Ensuring that the research offers a new and significant contribution.
  • Research Methodology: The accuracy and validity of the methodology used.
  • Analysis of Results: The reliability and accuracy of analysis and results.
  • Clarity of Writing: The clarity and organization of the text and explanations.
  • Documentation and References: The use of appropriate and up-to-date references.

4. Confidentiality of the Process

The review process is confidential, and the identities of authors and reviewers are not disclosed. Information related to the manuscript is used solely for the purpose of the review process and not for any other purpose.

5. Reviewers' Rights

  • Respect and Appreciation: The journal values the efforts of reviewers and appreciates their contributions to improving the quality of scientific research.
  • Acknowledgment: Reviewers' contributions are recognized through certificates of appreciation and opportunities to participate in advisory boards.

6. Reviewers' Commitment

  • Integrity and Impartiality: Reviewers are expected to provide objective and unbiased evaluations.
  • Effective Communication: Timely responses and constructive feedback are expected.
  • Confidentiality: Maintaining confidentiality of information and not using it for any other purpose.

7. Review Timeline

  • Acceptance or Rejection of Review Request: Reviewers are given 3 days to accept or decline the review request from the journal.
  • Submission of Review Decision: Reviewers are expected to provide their review decision within 10 to 14 days from the acceptance date. If this timeline is not met, the editorial board will assign another reviewer.

Through the peer review process, Queen Arwa University Journal aims to achieve the highest standards of quality in published research and to foster trust among researchers and the academic community. Thank you for your contribution to this vital process.